Expensive stuff from Bilton and Steenberg
A cynic, said Oscar Wilde, is "a man who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing". Lacking Wildean succinctness, let me venture that the cynical wine producer sets a price so excessively above his wine's value that he's clearly strategising beyond mere sales.
Enter Mark Bilton, who owns the eponymous winery in Stellenbosch and has just released a cabernet for R3000 a bottle, more than double the previously most expensive local pretender, another red, a big, ultra-ripe blend from Rust en Vrede. Internationally many wines cost apparently silly amounts, but most acquired their prices after, rather than before (or instead of), earning some renown for quality. Incidentally, the Bilton press release didn't even bother to indicate the vintage of the wine, but it appears to be a 2006.
Little of The Bilton is likely to be sold but this egregious example of "aspirational pricing" presumably aims mostly to add spurious lustre to a name and get it into circulation. The latter at least is working, you observe.
I haven't tasted the wine and am unlikely to. The serious end of wine journalism was largely not invited to the launch, understandably. (How many serious wine critics would have accepted an invitation is unclear; looking at how relatively poorly Bliton has performed over the years at Grape tastings of new releases would mean that our acceptance, at least, might have been as unlikely as the invitation!) Tweeters and bloggers were there, however, seemingly as impressed as was expected of them. As to other reported tastings: In the Platter Guide, Greg de Bruyn, more generous about some of the estate's wines, awards Bilton four stars despite describing it as a "porty, inky, tannic leviathan", Journalist Cathy Marston, tasting at the launch, thought it "very, very good".
A presumed selling point - or discussion point - is that the wine was shunted five times to new oak barrels. To serious wine-lovers this indicates gross vulgarity: the purpose of "500% new oak" could have been only to add wood flavour and provide a story to wow the impressionably ignorant.
Good or not, it is rather odd that a wine of this kind should be linked with Giorgio Dalla Cia, associated rather more with classicism at Meerlust, where he was cellarmaster for many years. Bilton's press release calls him "legendary consultant winemaker Giorgio Dalla Cia", which is their privilege I suppose - though I confess I have always thought his contribution to Meerlust rather overrated in the popular imagination, and the Meerlust wines have improved greatly since his departure. Nonetheless, grappling with Rubicon, he never perpretated such things as 500% new oak!
Another strangely aspect is that the packaging of The Bilton looks, from photographs, to be sadly amateurish, and inappropriate to the country's most expensive wine. Without the class of good old-fashioned classicism (like Alto Rouge, for example),it also lacks the chic of more modern international styling. A winemaker, who'd better remain nameless, described the label to me as looking for all the world like the school badge of Worcester High....
A white alternative
The most expensive white wine in South Africa is pitched somewhat lower - although the guiding principle in setting the price was also, I believe, to crow boastfully from the heights. But - marking a difference with Bilton - Steenberg Magna Carta was conceived with the Constantia winery's established great reputation for its sauvignon blanc and semillon - the grape varieties of which the blend is composed.
The second bottling of the wine, 2009, was released recently at R440 (there was no 2008 as quality was deemed inadequate).
(As to "most expensive white wine" - it has more recetnly occurred to me that although it is the most expensive one singly available, the wines included in the Sadie Ouwingerdreeks were more expensive. That set was sold - four whites, one red, and a half bottle of sweet wine - at something over R3000, making those whites definitely more expensive than the Magna Carta.)
Unlike Bilton, the Magna Carta was launched at a serious dinner party at Steenberg and bravely shared the table with some great wines from Champagne and Burgundy, which provided context for claims about quality. I tasted it again recently, with Steenberg's Semillon and Sauvignon Blanc Reserve of the same vintage - also expensive wines, approaching R200 a bottle.
Again I was convinced of Magna Carta's superb, subtle quality - it happily stands with the best examples of the magisterial class of South African blends in the tradition of Bordeaux (Vergelegen is the pioneer and best known). Worth the price? Well, yes, if you can afford it and are happy to leave it to its own mysterious development, somewhere cool and dark, for three or four years at least.
Incidentally, on the strength of just two vintages, Magna Carta is one of only 10 wines nominated by all the professional selectors in a poll reported on the Grape website, naming South Africa's 100 best wines.
Also on the top 100 list is one of the Cape's undoubted great white bargains, at about R35 - Kleine Zalze Bush Vine Chenin Blanc. Zero percent new oak. Zero cynicism.
First published in the Mail & Guardian, 1-7 April 2011, but this is an expanded version
- Tim James's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Re: Expensive stuff from Bilton and Steenberg
Maybe the reason the 2008 was not released as a Magna Carta, wasn't because of lack of quality, but because of stylistic issues: I certainly tasted some botrytis on it.
Re: Expensive stuff from Bilton and Steenberg
Hi Tim
For once I feel I must take issue with something: your description of those invited to attend the Bilton launch as "impressionably ignorant" - particularly in the case of the only writer you actually mention by name.
Cathy Marston has more tasting credentials than most wine writers in SA - a diploma from the UK’s Wine & Spirit Education Trust, UK trade experience working for wine merchant Adnams, local wine-buying experience while running The Nose Restaurant, and having taught goodness knows how many people about wine through her very popular and recently reintroduced wine course.
That she has only relatively recently started writing about wine is immaterial; far more important is the fact that she does it rather well! It is not insignificant that she has more Twitter followers than any other wine writer in the country - 1340 at last count. To put that in perspective, Neil Pendock only has 821.
Sadly I wasn't invited to the Bilton launch either. Am I envious? Absolutely. Apart from anything else, it apparently ended in a riotous game of Bananagrams! But surely even my revelation that fun was had at a wine event (shock horror) doesn't mean that Cathy and co don't take wine seriously, or indeed that we shouldn't take them seriously.
Re: Expensive stuff from Bilton and Steenberg
Thanks Jo for a measured, mature and well-worded comment - with which I wholeheartedly agree.
Clarifying response to Joanne
Ah, I was unclear, it seems. But please read what I wrote: "the serious end of wine journalism was LARGELY not there" - ie I allowed that some serious journalism was represented. I referred to "tweeters and bloggers" I suppose a bit disparagingly, and then referred to Cathy Marston as a "journalist". I had no intention of disparaging Cathy. I instanced her opinion, along with Greg de Bruyn's, as valid counterweights to my own suggestion - without any intention of disparaging Cathy, whose tasting and writing abilities and seriousness I respect, and whose judgement I read in a newspaper column, not on Twitter or a blog. (Although, frankly, I am unimpressed either way by how many or few Twitter followers she has!) So, I'm sorry if I've caused any offence to those who didn't understand my intentions in regard to the citation of Cathy.
As to my rather dismisive approach to those who only "Twitter and blog". That's a rather risky and rudely generalising thing to have done, i admit. My impression of them, as a whole, is that they are not at "the more serious end", however valid their function (and they are probably more useful to producers than the "serious" critics). Few of them have much experience or training, and I do not think that most of them would regard themselves as serious wine critics, do you? Surely that is an oft-repeated raison d'etre?
Re: Clarifying response to Joanne
Aussiewinechick, beware not to fall prey to Emile Joubert’s influence, he is the bottom end of the barrel in South African PR. He would want you to believe he is a media guru, but he was fired from every writing job he ever had. Sadly, he has no real forum to write about his clients anymore, except the magazine his wife represents, wonder when they are going to cotton on and count the articles "influenced" by his clients? Now that would be an interesting little project for someone with time on their hands.
Like the class clown he is tolerated by a few idiots for entertainment value and not much more. He should use his energy more constructively, and start an exercise regime, he is getting very "pudding faced" these days.
Tim, thank you for an honest reply, I am sure Cathy Marston will be open minded enough to give your reply some airtime on twitter, where you have been branded a "prick", by the Winetimes team among others - not a very professional move for a young company wanting to make their living from the wine industry I might add.
Re: Expensive stuff from Bilton and Steenberg
@PR Pain
My word, this is worst than a Perez Hilton post. Always the tail end of a story!
This is what I tweeted:
"hmm seems @neilpendock & @grapecoza have something in common, both not fans of bloggers and twitter http://wyn.cc/t9nsk"
Why? To lure Neil to respond on twitter. I've mention before, we really miss him there. Supseqently he did respond with a tweet. Job done! (Neil knows this game well)
But then some other tweeps responded of which three branded Tim as a prick (none of them http://winetimes.co.za employees) and thats the story of online. Everyone has an opinion.
Re: Clarifying response to Joanne
Being "just" a Tweeter and Blogger, I must say your generalisation of us being on the non serious end of the spectrum is pretty insulting. The fact that I "only" blog and tweet might cover the fact that I used to be a sommelier for one of the biggest wine programs in the country and top spenders at Nederburg and the CWG auctions. The fact that I write about wine and food and am part of the "new" movement of people who actually want wine to be fun and accesible to all, doesn't make me ignorant about the subject. Perhaps, instead of looking like an idiot (as you do now), you might want to research the people you are criticising.
Sadly I was not at the event.
Re: Expensive stuff from Bilton and Steenberg
And this kind of attitude is exactly why the price of top-end South African wine will remain stuck in the dark ages...as soon as an Estate sticks its neck out the South African industry role players reach immediately for the axe (in some cases without even tasting the wine, enter Tim). A quite disgusting attitude in my opinion.
Re: Expensive stuff from Bilton and Steenberg
I hardly think Tim's attitude to this wine's price is "disgusting".
I completely agree that R3000 per bottle and 500% new oak is cynical and quite frankly ridiculous. Especially since he is also talking about track record here - "most acquired their prices after, rather than before (or instead of), earning some renown for quality."
I think all this jumping up and down about who was invited and who was insulted misses the point.
I wonder if this scam has helped them sell even one more bottle of wine.
Re: Clarifying response to Joanne
Hennie
Where were you a Sommelier and who did you do your studies with? Always interesting to know when the term "Sommelier" gets thrown around.